Chris Wharton is a freelance illustrator and designer who is based in London. I was interested in interviewing him after my
previous blog post and he was nice enough to reply.
1: Due to the recent rise in
digital publishing do you think the physical book is losing
popularity?
No. Although ebooks are lightweight,
many volumed, legible in low light and fantastic prop to pose
with on public transport I think there will always be a place for
good old ink and paper. Personally I would never use or own an ebook.
I spend 80% of my day staring at at computer screen and the thought
of relaxing in front of one makes my eyes feel like sand paper (more
so). I think ebooks have opened up the world of reading to a wider
audience and reading as a past time has only increased in years but I
think essentially we are tactile creatures that like to hold, feel,
sniff and run our eyes over the real McCoy. Plus theres a whole
market of limited edition books and signed copies that will never die
out.
2: Does this affect
your design process? Influence your approach to designing the
physical book?
I've never designed for an ebook, nor
read one so I'm probably not the best person to ask this. However I
will speculate that when designing for the physical book you can
naturally play with its dimensions; wrap around designs, die cut
parts, embossing and various bells and whistles that bring a cover to
life and invite the on-looker to participate and investigate the
cover further, which is essentially the whole point of having a
cover.
3: Would you find the
front cover of a digital book more limiting to design for?
I don't know, do they semi-animate
ebook covers or anything fancy? I guess that would be the counter
argument to the one above. You're limited by physical dimension but
abundant in effects and motion in the ebook.
4: Would you take
advantage of a book's physicality in your design?
If the design physicality lent itself
to the content of the book or was a relevant exaggeration or
elaboration I think its natural to play with the dimensions. I hate
to use myself as an example but, if you look at some of the Hemingway
covers I mocked up some of those make full use of the play and
relationship between the front and back covers. the Bulls head
peeking on to the front page from the back, when you turn to the back
you can see the enormity of the bull and the exaggeration of fear and
danger that the book tells of. By delaying the on-lookers reading of
the illustration you can conjure different ideas or
effects.
Naturally other effects convey different concepts -
embossing and gold foiling speak of quality and opulence, die cutting
usually has some device relating to revealing or conducting the eye
in a particular manner.
5: How do you use your
design to interest the modern audience in a classic book? For
example, your Ernest Hemingway series.
I think stylistically the Hemingway
series was well received with a touch of fluke. I think theres a
renaissance of 50's style illustration-minimal illustrations which
manage to maintain a sense of personality. The book being authored by
a post-war writer it naturally lent itself to this style which
happens to be in vogue. But in general, I think there are myriad ways
of illustrating classic themes with contemporary styles. If you take
a look at the Penguin 'deluxe edition' series its a collection of
well known illustrators invited to illustrate the cover of their
favourite books, its amazing you have Chris Ware drawing Voltaire,
Tom Gauld with the Three Musketeers, Charles Burns drawing the Jungle
and Jason with Jack Kerouac. These are all illustrators with very
distinct styles drawing subjects from through out history. I suppose
as long as your draw something convincing and engaging people will
respond to it.
6: Do you think that
interactive book designs are most suited toward a younger audience?
Could they still interest adults?
I think it would be easy to assume
that, but I was walking along the south bank yesterday and on the
tube and tonnes of old(er) people are getting to grips with
technology. and if you think about it you can magnify the page, read
in the dark and they're light and portable, which is ideal for the
older generation. So bearing this in mind its only a matter of time
before interaction is just another aspect that they get to grips with
too. Also this divide between old and young with technology is only a
divide at present, as this young generation grows older and in the
next 40- 50 years there won't be a single person that wasn;t born
using a computer and all the inherent toys within.
7:
Matte vs. gloss?
I make pretty pictures and then the
publishers tweak and play with the results. But personally - matte.
9: On a whole, do you
prefer reading ebooks or the physical copy of a book?
I think I've only ever read maybe two
books online and this was only out of necessity (I was on holiday and
ran out of things to read), it wasn't a terrible experience but
neither was it as relaxing or as enjoyable as reclining with an
actual book. I'll always prefer the hard copy.
---
Chris Wharton's responses were very interesting to consider. He touched on what I had learned from my research; how ebooks are making books and reading more popular, but there is still a market who prefer physical copies. He also noted that there were different methods available to the designer when producing artwork for the physical copy.